Starknet asked STRK owners, through a community swimming pool , whether the network must discover coming to be an independent post-quantum Layer 1 (L 1; action that can offer it much more control over security and data accessibility. It is not a ballot to leave Ethereum: the survey is non-binding, and a Yes outcome would start study instead of set off a prompt migration.
The instance for exploring a modification is that parts of Starknet’s safety and security model still rely on Ethereum. The forum proposal claims Starknet-controlled elements can come to be quantum-resistant soon, while Ethereum-linked elements-including the bridge and data availability-remain linked to Ethereum’s timeline.
The main trade-off is better cryptographic autonomy versus the safety and security, liquidity, bridge and environment advantages of staying attached to Ethereum.
Must Starknet come to be an independent L 1
It’s time for the area to have its say.
STRK stakers and delegaters can currently take part in the initial, non-binding governance vote on this potential change
https://t.co/R 71 MnnJLcg pic.twitter.com/ 6 pCFSlK 1 VU
— StarkWare (@StarkWareLtd) October 15, 2026
Trade Safely With 0% Trading Charges on MEXC
How Would An Independent Post-Quantum L 1 Change Starknet?
As a Layer 2 (L 2, Starknet runs about Ethereum as opposed to running every part of its very own security and data infrastructure. Data schedule means the info needed to inspect and rebuild network activity is accessible; an L 2 that depends on Ethereum for this function is influenced by Ethereum’s choices and upgrade routine.
An independent L 1 might offer Starknet a lot more straight control over its own protection, agreement and data accessibility. Agreement is the process by which a network agrees on which transactions and blocks are valid. That control might help Starknet address elements that the online forum proposition says stay dependent on Ethereum, however self-reliance would certainly likewise indicate taking duty for those features itself.
The proposal indicates Starknet’s existing use hash-based STARK evidence and indigenous account abstraction as components of its quantum-security beginning factor. Account abstraction means accounts can be regulated by smart-contract reasoning instead of relying on one trademark scheme built right into the procedure; the message claims user accounts can embrace post-quantum signatures without a method upgrade. That is a significant design benefit, not evidence that every element is already quantum-resistant. The wider danger to blockchain trademarks is discussed in this summary of post-quantum cryptography
Why Does the Ethereum Link Issue?
The safety rationale is about control over timing: the proposition states Starknet’s Ethereum-dependent bridge and data-availability components comply with Ethereum’s timeline, while an independent chain could control even more of its very own stack. But control does not come cost-free. A standalone network would certainly require to make its own plans for agreement, economic protection, data schedule and bridges-and show those plans can function safely.
For STRK holders, the trade-off is in between even more freedom and the threats of structure and keeping more infrastructure. Execution obstacles, liquidity fragmentation, bridge safety and security, tooling and the wider ecological community can all form just how an L 1 shift influences users.
Various other blockchain movement proposals also show why administration approval and execution are separate hurdles; a comparable Layer 1 movement proposal deals context for the sensible dangers of altering a network’s instructions. It does not establish what Starknet’s very own transition would include.
DISCOVER: 10 + Next Crypto to 100 X In 2026
Can Starknet In Fact Leave Ethereum?
Starknet is discovering a path towards becoming an independent post-quantum L 1
An administration post is currently deal with a non-binding survey for STRK owners to share their views. https://t.co/ 89 bUM 2 zTR 2
— Starknet (@Starknet) October 15, 2026
The verified action is an exploratory, non-binding poll-not an approved Ethereum departure. If holders choose Yes, the proposal states study would begin, with even more in-depth propositions and polls to comply with. The layout and operation of independent protection, agreement and data schedule would remain main concerns, along with effects for liquidity, bridges and the more comprehensive ecological community.
For now, the proposition maintains 2 points clear: STRK remains the token, and Ethereum bridges stay open. The poll closes after seven days, when its result will certainly show whether holders sustain further research, choose proceeded L 2 job, or want the discussion to remain open pending answers.
DISCOVER: 15 + Future Coinbase Listings to View in 2026
Follow 99 Bitcoins on X For the most recent Market Updates and Subscribe on YouTube For Daily Professional Market Analysis.
The post STRK Owners Consider Starknet’s Post-Quantum Future showed up initially on 99 Bitcoins
